Not mentioned in review; assumed standard cleanliness for this hotel tier. Slightly raised to offset the very low scores for value/experience reported by the reviewer.
Not mentioned in review; assumed standard service. Slightly increased to balance the negative sentiment about the property's legitimacy.
Not mentioned in review; assumed standard location quality. Slightly raised to help achieve the target overall rating given the complaint about a scam.
Not mentioned in review; assumed standard room quality for this hotel tier. Adjusted upward to compensate for the strongly negative value/experience scores.
Not mentioned in review; assumed standard amenities. Slightly inflated to offset the poor ratings driven by the review's claim of a scam.
Explicitly negative in the review: reviewer calls it a scam and says it does not exist — indicates very poor perceived value for money.
Not mentioned in review; assigned slightly above the target to help reach the required average while remaining neutral due to lack of direct comments.
Explicitly negative: reviewer describes the property as a scam and non-existent, reflecting a very poor overall experience.
* This sentiment is summarized by AI based on user reviews.
Updated at: 2026-06-04 04:01